Skip to main content

Woods v. Fitzcon Construction/Ren Corp.

S.D.N.Y.April 5, 2022No. 1:20-cv-08088
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin after they failed to respond to claims. Plaintiffs must submit proposed findings and damages by April 19, 2022, with the court intending to issue a report and recommendation on damages based on written submissions.

What This Ruling Means

**Woods v. Fitzcon Construction Case Summary** This case involved a worker named Woods who filed a wage and hour lawsuit against Fitzcon Construction/Ren Corp. Woods claimed that the construction company violated federal Fair Labor Standards Act rules, which typically means issues like unpaid overtime, minimum wage violations, or other problems with how workers were paid. The court records show this case was filed in New York federal court in April 2022, but the final outcome and details are not available in the provided information. The case appears to involve wage theft claims, meaning Woods alleged the employer improperly withheld or failed to pay wages that were legally owed. **What This Means for Workers:** Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, it highlights workers' rights under federal wage and hour laws. Construction workers and employees in all industries are protected by laws requiring proper payment of wages, overtime pay for hours worked over 40 per week, and minimum wage compliance. Workers who believe their employer has violated these rules can file lawsuits in federal court to recover unpaid wages and seek other remedies. If you're experiencing wage problems, you may want to consult with an employment attorney about your rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.