No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties settled the plaintiff's Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law claims for $60,000. The settlement was approved by the court and the case was dismissed with prejudice.
Acevedo v. Urban Management LLC: Wage Theft Case
This case involved a worker who filed a lawsuit against Urban Management LLC claiming wage theft violations. The employee alleged that the company failed to pay proper wages as required under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the federal law that sets minimum wage and overtime requirements for workers.
The case was filed in federal court in New York in April 2022. However, the court's final decision and outcome are not available from the public records provided. The case falls under labor law violations, specifically focusing on whether the employer properly compensated the worker according to federal wage standards.
Why This Matters for Workers:
Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, it highlights an important issue workers face: wage theft. This occurs when employers don't pay workers what they legally owe, whether through unpaid overtime, below minimum wage payments, or other compensation violations. Workers have the right to file federal lawsuits when employers violate wage laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act provides protections that allow employees to seek compensation for unpaid wages, and cases like this demonstrate that workers can take legal action when their pay rights are violated.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.