Skip to main content

Sanchez v. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC

S.D.N.Y.May 26, 2022No. 1:21-cv-06305
Plaintiff Win2050 Valentine Avenue LLC$150,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages for wage theft.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** A worker named Sanchez filed a lawsuit against their employer, 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC, claiming the company failed to pay proper wages. This type of case is commonly called "wage theft," where employees argue their employer didn't pay them all the money they were legally owed. The lawsuit was filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace payment requirements. **What the Court Decided:** The court records don't show the final outcome of this case. Employment law cases like this can end in several ways - the court might rule in favor of the worker and order the employer to pay back wages, the case might be settled out of court, or it could be dismissed. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that workers have legal options when they believe their employer hasn't paid them properly. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives employees the right to sue for unpaid wages, overtime, or other compensation violations. Even if we don't know how this specific case ended, it demonstrates that workers can take legal action against wage theft and seek to recover money they're owed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.