No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties reached a settlement in principle in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The court ordered the parties to submit a joint letter explaining the settlement terms and scheduled a settlement approval hearing for July 22, 2022.
Worker Files Wage Violation Claim Against Management Company
Jose De la Cruz filed a lawsuit against Arbeni Management Company Inc. in federal court in New York, claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that requires employers to pay workers minimum wage and overtime pay for hours worked over 40 in a week. While the specific details of De la Cruz's complaint aren't available, FLSA cases typically involve disputes over unpaid wages, overtime violations, or misclassification of workers as exempt from overtime requirements.
The court outcome for this case is not yet known, as the matter was filed in July 2022 and may still be pending or recently resolved.
Why This Matters for Workers:
This case highlights workers' rights under federal wage laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects most employees by ensuring they receive proper compensation for their work. If you believe your employer has violated wage and hour laws—such as not paying overtime, paying below minimum wage, or requiring off-the-clock work—you have the right to file a complaint. Workers should keep detailed records of their hours and pay to support any potential claims.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in De la Cruz v. Arbeni Management Company Inc. from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.