Skip to main content

Arbeni Management Company Inc.

5 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (20132022)

3 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Arbeni Management Company Inc. as an employer in 5 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2022.

The most common claims on record were Wage Theft.

Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

3
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.

1
States

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Arbeni Management Company Inc. appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:

De la Cruz v. Arbeni Management Company Inc. (2022) — Settlement. Employee De la Cruz filed a lawsuit against Arbeni Management Company Inc. in 2022, claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other basic workplace protections. Read the ruling.

De la Cruz v. Arbeni Management Company Inc. (2022) — Settlement. Jose De la Cruz filed a lawsuit against Arbeni Management Company Inc. in federal court in New York, claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that requires employers to pay workers minimum wage and overtime pay for hours worked over 40 in a week. Read the ruling.

Ramirez v. Arbeni Management Company Inc. (2021) — Settlement. Read the ruling.

The published opinion involves a wage theft claim. Browse other wage theft rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wage Theft.

Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.

Claim Types

Wage Theft
3 (100%)

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Arbeni Management Company Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · Jul 2022 · New York · Wage Theft
2 opinionsSettlement
Employee v. Arbeni Management Company Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · Oct 2021 · New York · Wage Theft
Settlement
Employee v. Arbeni Management Company Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · Mar 2018
Docket closed
Employee v. Arbeni Management Company Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · Jun 2017
Docket closed
Employee v. Arbeni Management Company, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · Nov 2013
Docket closed
Showing 5 of 5

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.