Labor Ready, Inc.
57 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2000–2018)
50 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 43 map to 42 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Labor Ready, Inc. as an employer in 57 distinct federal employment cases between 2000 and 2018.
Of the 50 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 24 ended in a ruling for the employer, 12 ended in a ruling for the worker, 5 had a mixed result, and 5 were sent back to a lower court.
Plaintiffs won 12 of 43 adjudicated opinions (28%).
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Wage Theft, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 8 states, most often in FL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 42 distinct cases.
12 of 43 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Labor Ready, Inc. appears in 50 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Margie Bedolla v. Labor Ready Southwest (2018) — Settlement. Based on the limited information available, this case involved Margie Bedolla and Labor Ready Southwest, a temporary staffing company, in what appears to be an employment-related dispute that went before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2018. Read the ruling.
Labor Ready Northeast, Inc. and ESIS v. WCAB (Lasky) (2018) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a workers' compensation claim by an employee named Lasky against Labor Ready Northeast, Inc., a temporary staffing company, and their insurance carrier ESIS. Read the ruling.
J.L. Nagle. v. TrueBlue, Inc., Labor Ready, Inc. and Labor Ready Northeast, Inc. and Rye Twp. (2016) — Defendant Win. J.L. Nagle filed an employment lawsuit against TrueBlue and its Labor Ready staffing companies, along with Rye Township. While the court records don't provide specific details about Nagle's complaints, the case involved employment law claims against these temporary staffing agencies and the township. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination (17 of 50), Wage Theft (14 of 50), Retaliation (3 of 50). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Wage Theft and Retaliation.
Published opinions span Florida (4), Texas (2), Louisiana (2), Tennessee (1). Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings, Texas rulings, Louisiana rulings and Tennessee rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
50 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 7 summary-judgment opinions, 4 ended the case in Labor Ready, Inc.’s favor and 3 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.