Labor Ready, Inc.
26 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2001–2018)
15 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 12 map to 11 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Labor Ready, Inc. is named as a party in 26 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2001 and 2018.
Of the 13 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 7 ended in a ruling for the worker, 5 ended in a ruling for the employer, and 1 was sent back to a lower court.
2 further opinions are listed below but left out of these outcome figures, because the employer brought the case or was not a party to it.
Plaintiffs won 7 of 12 adjudicated opinions (58%).
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in TN.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 11 distinct cases.
7 of 12 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Labor Ready, Inc. appears in 15 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
McDade, Derrick v. Labor Ready (2016) — Plaintiff Win. Derrick McDade filed a workers' compensation claim against his employer, Labor Ready, a temporary staffing agency that provides day laborers for various job sites. Read the ruling.
Allen v. Labor Ready Southwest CA2/5 (2013) — Plaintiff Win. Read the ruling.
Lynn v. Labor Ready, Inc. (2007) — Defendant Win. Lynn sued Labor Ready, a temporary staffing company, claiming the company was negligent and wrongfully terminated her. The core issue involved Labor Ready placing a worker with a serious criminal history (a level III sex offender) at a YWCA facility. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (9 of 15), Wrongful Termination (7 of 15), Discrimination (2 of 15). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination and Discrimination.
Published opinions span Tennessee (1), Texas (1). Tennessee is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Tennessee rulings and Texas rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
2 listed opinions are not counted here: the employer brought the case, or was not a party to an appeal against an agency, so the recorded outcome is not a result for or against a worker.
Opinion Stages
13 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
7 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
- Employee v. Labor Ready Southeast, Inc.Fla. Supreme · 2016 · Florida
- Employee v. Labor ReadyN.Y. App. Div. · 2010
- Employee v. Labor ReadyLa. Ct. App. · 2008
- Employee v. Labor ReadyFla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007
- Employee v. Labor Ready Northwest, Inc.Wash. Ct. App. · 2002
- Employee v. Labor Ready Northwest, Inc.Wash. Ct. App. · 2002
- Labor Ready, Inc. v. EmployeeMd. Ct. Spec. App. · 2001
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.