Aramark Services, Inc.
113 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2000–2026)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 10 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Aramark Services, Inc. is named as a party in 113 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2000 and 2026.
Across 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, recorded claim types include Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, and Retaliation.
The analyzed published opinions with a recorded state span 3 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Aramark Services, Inc. appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Oiyemhonlan v. Aramark Management Services, Inc. (2023) — Remanded. This case involved a discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee against Aramark Management Services, Inc., a large food service and facilities management company. Read the ruling.
Barker v. Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC (2020) — Settlement. A worker filed a complaint against Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel claiming racial discrimination, wage theft (not being paid properly), and retaliation. The case was handled through the New York state administrative system and arbitration. Read the ruling.
Adams v. Neubauer (2006) — Defendant Win. Three inmates sued Aramark Correctional Services and prison officials, claiming they were not paid fairly for work they performed while incarcerated. The prisoners argued they should receive the same wage protections that regular employees get under federal labor laws. Read the ruling.
Across 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, recorded claim types include Discrimination (3 of 5), Wrongful Termination (2 of 5), Retaliation (2 of 5). Browse the linked claim hubs for other published opinions involving these claim types. Discrimination, Wrongful Termination and Retaliation.
Published opinions span California (1), New York (1), District of Columbia (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, New York rulings and District of Columbia rulings.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court and docket; written opinions stay grouped inside their case. List captions may abbreviate names; public records and case details can identify the parties.
Other court records naming this party
1 published opinion names this party but is not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.