Express Employment Professionals
11 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2015–2024)
11 trusted published court opinions across 11 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Express Employment Professionals as an employer in 11 distinct federal employment cases between 2015 and 2024.
Of the 11 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 5 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 were dismissed, and 2 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Failure To Accommodate, and Workers Compensation.
Cases were filed across 6 states, most often in FL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 11 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Express Employment Professionals appears in 11 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Hicks v. Express Employment Professionals (2023) — Defendant Win. This case involved a workplace dispute between an employee named Hicks and Express Employment Professionals, a staffing agency that places workers in temporary and permanent positions with other companies. Read the ruling.
Brown v. Express Employment Professional (2023) — Dismissed. This case involved an employment discrimination dispute between a worker named Brown and Express Employment Professionals, a staffing company. Brown filed a lawsuit in 2023 claiming they experienced discrimination in the workplace, though the specific details about what type of discrimination occurred are not available… Read the ruling.
SYDER v. EXPRESS SERVICES, INC. (2023) — Remanded. A worker named Syder filed a lawsuit against Express Services, Inc. (also operating as Express Employment Professionals) and Cooperative Laundry, claiming discrimination, failure to provide required workplace accommodations, and wrongful termination. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 11), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 11), Workers’ Compensation (2 of 11). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Workers’ Compensation.
Published opinions span Florida (1), Kentucky (1), Tennessee (1), Nebraska (1). Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings, Kentucky rulings, Tennessee rulings and Nebraska rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
11 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
- Default judgment
- A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.