Skip to main content

Volman v. Santa Clarita Restaurant Corp.

S.D.N.Y.September 7, 2022No. 1:21-cv-04742
Plaintiff WinSanta Clarita Restaurant Corp$50,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The plaintiff won the case against Santa Clarita Restaurant Corp for failing to provide reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

What This Ruling Means

I cannot provide a summary of this employment law case because there appears to be an error in the information provided. The case title suggests this should be an employment dispute between a worker named Volman and Santa Clarita Restaurant Corp. However, the excerpt provided describes a completely different type of case - it's actually about criminal sentencing guidelines for someone convicted of illegally possessing a firearm, not an employment law matter. This mismatch means I don't have the actual details of what happened in the Volman employment case, what the court decided, or what damages were awarded. Without the correct case information, I cannot explain what this ruling means for workers. If you're looking for information about this specific employment case, you may need to obtain the correct court documents or case excerpt that actually relates to the employment dispute between Volman and Santa Clarita Restaurant Corp.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.