Skip to main content

Lopez v. Tristate Linen, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.December 14, 2022No. 1:22-cv-09271
SettlementTristate Linen, Inc.$9,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Settlement approved for $9,000 total recovery. Plaintiff Jean Luis Lopez received $4,774 after attorneys' fees ($3,600) and costs ($626) were deducted, representing 65.94% of the estimated full value of his wage and hour claims.

What This Ruling Means

Lopez v. Tristate Linen, Inc. – Case Summary

What Happened
Jean Luis Lopez worked for Tristate Linen, Inc. and claimed the company failed to pay him wages owed. Lopez pursued a lawsuit in federal court in New York over this wage theft dispute.

What the Court Decided
The case was settled for $9,000. After paying attorney fees ($3,600) and court costs ($626), Lopez received $4,774. This settlement covered about two-thirds of what he claimed he was owed in unpaid wages.

Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers can take legal action against employers who don't pay them properly, even when the full amount owed isn't recovered. The settlement demonstrates that courts take wage theft seriously. However, it also illustrates an important reality: attorney fees and costs reduce what workers actually receive. Workers pursuing wage claims should understand that while they may win, the final payment typically comes after these deductions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.