Skip to main content

Aponte v. Clinton Street Pizza Inc.

S.D.N.Y.February 7, 2023No. 1:22-cv-03188
Defendant WinPMG-S2 Sunny Isles, LLC$507,500 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's award of $507,500 in attorney's fees and costs to the defendant PMG, finding that despite Hess and Clearwater's assignment of the purchase agreements, they remained liable under the express terms of the Assignment Agreement.

What This Ruling Means

**Restaurant Workers Lost Contract Dispute, Ordered to Pay $507,500** This case involved a dispute over a restaurant purchase agreement at Clinton Street Pizza Inc. Workers or former employees (Hess and Clearwater) had signed contracts related to buying the restaurant business, but later tried to transfer their obligations to someone else through an assignment agreement. The court ruled against the workers and ordered them to pay $507,500 in attorney's fees and legal costs to the restaurant company (PMG-S2 Sunny Isles, LLC). Even though the workers had tried to assign their purchase agreements to other parties, the court found they were still legally responsible for the original contract terms. The appeals court upheld this decision, confirming the workers must pay the substantial legal fees. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights the importance of carefully reading any business contracts before signing them. When you sign a contract to purchase a business or take on significant financial obligations, you may remain personally liable even if you later try to transfer those responsibilities to someone else. Always consult with a lawyer before entering into major business agreements, as the financial consequences of breach can be severe.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.