Skip to main content

Shapiro v. John Doe Corp. I

S.D.N.Y.March 24, 2023No. 1:22-cv-05022
Defendant WinTrihop 14th Street LLC
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's FLSA time-shaving claim because plaintiff's average hourly wage exceeded the federal minimum wage, which is required to state a claim under the FLSA. State law claims were also dismissed for lack of supplemental jurisdiction.

What This Ruling Means

Shapiro v. John Doe Corp. I: Plain English Summary

What Happened

A worker named Shapiro sued his employer, Trihop 14th Street LLC, claiming wage theft. Specifically, he alleged that the company was engaged in "time-shaving"—a practice where employers reduce the hours workers actually worked on their timesheets, cutting their pay.

What the Court Decided

The court dismissed the case. The judge ruled that because Shapiro's average hourly wage exceeded the federal minimum wage, he did not meet the basic requirements to file a wage theft claim under federal law. The court also dismissed related state law claims.

Why This Matters for Workers

This ruling suggests that workers earning above minimum wage may face higher legal hurdles when challenging wage theft claims in federal court. However, this decision was specific to the facts of this case—workers should know that wage theft protections exist under both federal and state laws, and outcomes depend on individual circumstances. Workers facing similar issues should consult with an employment attorney who can review their specific situation and available legal options.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.