Chen v. Nara Sushi 76 Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved the parties' revised settlement agreement in this Fair Labor Standards Act wage dispute. The employer and individual defendants agreed to settle plaintiff's claims for unpaid wages and overtime under federal and New York law.
What This Ruling Means
Chen v. Nara Sushi 76 Inc. — Case Summary
What Happened
An employee named Chen filed a lawsuit against Nara Sushi 76 Inc., claiming the restaurant did not pay him proper wages and overtime compensation that he was owed under federal and New York labor laws.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement between Chen and the restaurant's owners. Rather than go to trial, both sides agreed to resolve the dispute through this settlement. While the exact payment amount was not disclosed, the agreement addressed the unpaid wages and overtime owed to Chen.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that employees can successfully challenge employers who fail to pay proper wages and overtime. Even when a case settles rather than going to trial, workers can recover money owed to them. If you believe your employer has underpaid you or failed to compensate overtime work, you have legal options available to pursue those wages through the court system.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.