Skip to main content

Chen v. Hunan Manor Enterprise, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.August 29, 2023No. 1:17-cv-00802
Plaintiff WinXerox
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Washington Supreme Court answered the certified question by holding that an employer's payment plan based on 'production minutes' does not qualify as a piecework plan under Washington law, meaning the employees were hourly workers entitled to minimum wage protections for all hours worked.

What This Ruling Means

**Restaurant Workers Win Wage Case Over Pay System** This case involved workers at Hunan Manor Enterprise who were paid based on a system called "production minutes" rather than traditional hourly wages. The workers claimed this payment method violated wage and hour laws because they weren't receiving proper minimum wage for all their work time. The Washington Supreme Court ruled in favor of the workers. The court found that the employer's "production minutes" pay system did not qualify as a legitimate piecework arrangement under Washington state law. This meant the workers were actually hourly employees who should have been guaranteed minimum wage for every hour they worked, regardless of their productivity or output. This ruling matters because it protects workers from employers who try to use creative pay schemes to avoid minimum wage requirements. Many workers, especially in restaurants and similar businesses, may encounter employers who claim they're paying "by the piece" or based on productivity metrics. This decision clarifies that such arrangements must meet specific legal standards, and workers can't be paid less than minimum wage simply because an employer calls their pay system something other than hourly wages. Workers facing similar situations should know their rights to minimum wage protection.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.