Skip to main content

Ramos v. Apple Inc.

S.D.N.Y.September 6, 2023No. 7:22-cv-02761
Plaintiff WinApple Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Labor: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court denied defendant Apple's motion to dismiss, allowing plaintiffs' NYLL Section 191 wage-payment claims to proceed. The court held that the NYLL provides a private right of action for untimely wage payments and that liquidated damages are available as a remedy.

What This Ruling Means

Ramos v. Apple Inc.: What Workers Need to Know

What Happened

Employees brought a lawsuit against Apple, claiming the company failed to pay their wages on time. Under New York law, employers must pay workers by specific deadlines. The workers sued, seeking compensation for these wage-payment violations.

What the Court Decided

The court sided with the workers by rejecting Apple's attempt to dismiss the case early. The judge confirmed that New York law allows workers to sue their employers directly for late wage payments and that workers can receive extra damages as a penalty when this happens.

Why This Matters

This ruling strengthens workers' ability to hold employers accountable for late paychecks. It clarifies that workers don't need special circumstances to sue—they simply need proof that paychecks arrived late. The availability of penalty damages makes it more costly for large employers to ignore wage-payment rules. This decision reinforces that timely pay is a fundamental worker right in New York, not just a suggestion employers can ignore without consequences.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Ramos from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.