Gil v. Pizzarotti, LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- settlement
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Employees Gil and Hernandez, on behalf of themselves and 40 opt-in plaintiffs, settled FLSA and New York Labor Law wage and overtime claims against Pizzarotti Defendants for $460,000. The court subsequently awarded the Pizzarotti Defendants $460,000 in indemnification damages from defaulted Atlantic Defendants (the actual employers).
What This Ruling Means
Gil v. Pizzarotti, LLC Settlement Summary
What Happened
Employees named Gil and Hernandez, along with 40 other workers, sued Pizzarotti, LLC claiming they were not paid properly for their work. Specifically, they alleged wage theft and improper overtime pay under federal and New York state labor laws. The case involved questions about whether workers received the wages and overtime compensation they were legally owed.
Court Decision
The case was settled for $460,000 in damages. This means the company and employees agreed to end the dispute, with the company paying this amount to compensate the affected workers. The court later determined that the company responsible for paying wages (Atlantic Defendants) was ultimately liable for this payment.
Why This Matters
This case demonstrates that workers have legal protections against wage theft and improper overtime practices. When employers fail to pay workers correctly, employees can band together in lawsuits and recover compensation. The settlement shows courts will enforce wage laws and hold companies financially accountable for underpaying workers—a significant protection for low-wage and hourly employees.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Gil from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.