Zeng v. USA QR Culture Industrial Development LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement whereby plaintiff received $30,000 in total settlement funds ($19,307 net after $10,693 in attorney's fees and costs), representing approximately 39% of her estimated maximum recovery under FLSA and New York State Labor Law wage-and-hour claims.
What This Ruling Means
Plain English Summary: Zeng v. USA QR Culture Industrial Development LLC
What Happened
Zeng filed a lawsuit against USA QR Culture Industrial Development LLC, claiming the company failed to pay her wages properly in violation of federal and New York State labor laws. These wage theft claims alleged the employer did not compensate her fairly for work performed.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement where Zeng received $30,000 in total settlement funds. After paying attorney's fees and court costs, she took home $19,307. This settlement represented about 39% of what she could have potentially recovered if she had won the case completely.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that employees can successfully challenge employers over unpaid wages. While settlements often mean workers don't recover the full amount owed, they still represent significant compensation for wage violations. If you believe your employer hasn't paid you properly, you have legal options available through both federal and state labor laws to seek recovery.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.