Skip to main content

Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 373 United Assocation of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Benefit Funds v. Mid Orange Mechanical Corp.

S.D.N.Y.May 16, 2024No. 7:17-cv-02669
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court granted Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, holding defendants jointly and severally liable for unpaid fringe benefit contributions and withdrawal liability under ERISA. Defendants were found liable for approximately $147,611.35 in unpaid contributions plus withdrawal liability of $631,978.00.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Benefit Fund vs. Mid Orange Mechanical Corp: Court Case Summary** This case involved a dispute between a plumbers' union benefit fund and Mid Orange Mechanical Corp, a plumbing contractor. The union's benefit fund claimed that the company failed to make required contributions to worker pension and benefit plans as required under federal law (ERISA). These contributions are typically part of union contracts where employers must pay into funds that provide healthcare, retirement, and other benefits for workers. The court case appears to have ended without a clear resolution, with no damages awarded. The specific outcome details are limited, but the case centered on whether the employer properly fulfilled its obligations to contribute to union benefit funds that support worker benefits. This case matters for workers because it highlights the importance of employer contributions to benefit funds. When companies don't pay required contributions to union benefit plans, it can affect workers' healthcare coverage, pension benefits, and other protections. Workers in unionized trades should understand that their employers have legal obligations to make these payments, and union benefit funds can take legal action when companies fail to meet these requirements. Such cases help ensure that negotiated benefits are actually funded and available to workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.