No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court found Leone Construction in civil contempt for failing to comply with a prior order to respond to an information subpoena and pay $922.00 in damages. The court imposed a coercive monetary sanction of $100 per day until full compliance and awarded $680.00 in attorney's fees to the plaintiffs.
Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund v. Leone Construction, Inc.
This case involved a dispute between the Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund and Leone Construction, Inc. over violations of ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act). The welfare fund, which provides benefits to union workers, sued the construction company for failing to meet its obligations under federal law that protects employee benefit plans.
ERISA requires employers to properly manage and contribute to employee benefit funds, including health insurance, retirement plans, and other welfare benefits. When employers don't follow these rules, benefit funds can take legal action to enforce compliance and protect workers' benefits.
The specific outcome of this case is not available in the court records provided, so it's unclear how the dispute was resolved.
What this means for workers: This case highlights the importance of ERISA protections for employee benefits. Workers should know that federal law requires employers to properly handle benefit contributions and plan management. If an employer fails to meet these obligations, benefit funds and workers have legal recourse. Workers who suspect their employer isn't properly contributing to their benefit plans should contact their union representative or the benefit fund administrator to investigate potential violations.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund v. Leone Construction, Inc. from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.