Skip to main content

Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund v. Leone Construction, Inc.

W.D.N.Y.October 23, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00544
Plaintiff WinLeone Construction, Inc.$43,995 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiffs prevailed in their ERISA action for unpaid contributions under a collective bargaining agreement. The court granted the motion for summary judgment, awarding attorneys' fees of $43,995 (reduced from $62,850 requested) plus other uncontested relief for delinquent fringe benefit payments.

What This Ruling Means

**Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund v. Leone Construction, Inc.** This case involved a dispute between Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund and Leone Construction, Inc. over alleged violations of ERISA, the federal law that protects employee benefits like health insurance and retirement plans. The welfare fund claimed that Leone Construction failed to meet its obligations under ERISA regulations, which typically involve employers properly contributing to or managing employee benefit plans. The court dismissed the case, meaning the judge ruled in favor of Leone Construction. The welfare fund's claims were not successful, and no monetary damages were awarded. The court determined that Leone Construction did not violate ERISA requirements as alleged. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling highlights the importance of ERISA protections for employee benefits. While this particular case was dismissed, ERISA remains a crucial law that ensures employers properly handle worker benefit plans. Workers should understand that they have legal protections for their health insurance, pension plans, and other benefits. If workers suspect their employer is mishandling benefit contributions or plan administration, they may have grounds to file complaints. However, as this case shows, not all ERISA claims succeed, and the specific facts of each situation matter significantly in determining the outcome.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.