No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff Boards of Trustees obtained a default judgment against Freisthler Paving, Inc. for breach of contract, recovering $15,630.90 in liquidated damages and interest, plus $2,380 in attorney fees.
Ohio Laborers' Benefits Case Against Freisthler Paving
This case involved a dispute between the Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs and Freisthler Paving, Inc., a construction company. The trustees, who manage benefit programs for laborers, claimed that Freisthler Paving failed to meet its obligations to contribute to worker fringe benefit programs. These fringe benefits typically include health insurance, pension contributions, and other benefits that employers are required to pay into on behalf of their union workers.
The case was filed in an Ohio federal court in August 2019, but the final outcome and court decision are not available in the public records provided.
What This Means for Workers:
This type of case highlights the importance of employer contributions to fringe benefit programs. When companies fail to make required benefit payments, workers can lose access to healthcare, retirement savings, and other crucial benefits they've earned. Union benefit trustees actively monitor and enforce these obligations to protect workers' interests. If you're a union worker and suspect your employer isn't making proper benefit contributions, you should contact your union representative or the benefit fund trustees who can investigate and take legal action if necessary.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.