Skip to main content

SCANLAN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC.

E.D. Pa.May 5, 2020No. 2:18-cv-04040
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Labor Litigations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed summary judgment for defendants on the defamation claim, holding that statements made to the plaintiff's authorized agent were not published. However, the court reversed summary judgment on intentional tort claims, holding that the prospective release violates public policy as applied to intentional torts.

What This Ruling Means

**Employee Wins Partial Victory in Dispute Over Intentional Workplace Harm** This case involved an employee named Scanlan who sued American Airlines Group and another company called Mutual Assurance Society of Alabama (MASA) for several workplace-related claims, including defamation and intentional harm. The court reached a split decision. On the defamation claim, the court ruled against Scanlan, finding that certain statements weren't actually "published" or shared with others in a way that counts as defamation under the law. However, the court sided with Scanlan on claims involving intentional workplace misconduct. The key issue was whether the employee could be forced to give up their right to sue for intentional wrongdoing as a condition of employment or settlement. The court said no – such agreements violate public policy when they involve intentional harm. This matters for workers because it reinforces an important protection: employers cannot force employees to waive their rights to sue for intentional misconduct, even through employment agreements or settlement releases. While employers can sometimes limit liability for accidents or negligence, they cannot shield themselves from consequences when they deliberately harm workers. This helps ensure accountability for the worst workplace behavior.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.