Skip to main content

TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. EASTERN ELEVATOR SERVICE, INC.

E.D. Pa.August 30, 2021No. 2:20-cv-06150
Plaintiff WinEastern Elevator Service, Inc.$256,949.05 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Trustees of multi-employer benefit funds prevailed on summary judgment against Eastern Elevator Service for failure to pay required pension and welfare fund contributions under a collective bargaining agreement. The court awarded $256,949.05 in unpaid contributions, prejudgment interest, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

Court Rules Against Eastern Elevator Service for Unpaid Pension Contributions

What Happened

Eastern Elevator Service, Inc. failed to pay required contributions into pension and welfare funds for its workers as promised under a union contract. The trustees managing these worker benefit funds sued to recover the missing money.

What the Court Decided

The court ruled in favor of the pension fund trustees. Eastern Elevator Service was ordered to pay $256,949.05, which included the unpaid contributions, interest, additional penalties, and the legal fees the fund had to spend fighting the case.

Why This Matters for Workers

This ruling protects worker retirement and health benefits. When employers skip required pension contributions, workers' future security suffers. This decision sends a clear message that companies cannot ignore their financial obligations to worker benefit plans. It also makes it expensive for employers to break these promises—they must pay back the money plus penalties—which discourages other companies from doing the same. Workers covered by union contracts depend on these contributions for retirement income and healthcare, making this enforcement critical to their financial wellbeing.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.