Skip to main content

COPLEY v. EVOLUTION WELL SERVICES, LLC

W.D. Pa.November 17, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01442
Defendant WinLos Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Labor: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The appellate court denied the mother's petition for extraordinary writ, affirming the juvenile court's order terminating reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing for permanent placement of the children due to mother's continued substance abuse and failure to comply with case plan requirements.

What This Ruling Means

I notice there's some confusion in the case information provided. The case title shows "COPLEY v. EVOLUTION WELL SERVICES, LLC" which appears to be an employment discrimination case, but the outcome details describe a completely different matter involving child custody and family services. Based on the case title and claims listed (discrimination against Evolution Well Services, LLC), this appears to be an employment discrimination lawsuit. However, the outcome details describe a family court case about terminating parental reunification services due to substance abuse issues. Without the correct case details, I cannot provide an accurate summary of what actually happened in the Copley v. Evolution Well Services employment case. The information appears to have been mixed up with an unrelated family law matter. To properly explain this case's impact on workers, I would need the correct court ruling details for the actual employment discrimination case between Copley and Evolution Well Services, LLC. Could you please verify and provide the accurate case information?

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination cases

Similar Rulings

Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Coleman
7th CircuitJun 2017
Remanded
Kwan v. The Andalex Group LLC
2nd CircuitDec 2013
Mixed Result
Read Full OpinionAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from PennsylvaniaMore discrimination casesMore government & public sector employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.