Skip to main content

BURBACH v. ARCONIC CORPORATION

W.D. Pa.September 22, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00723
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
751 Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationFailure to AccommodateDiscrimination

Outcome

Court denied defendant's motion to dismiss FMLA and ADA claims. Plaintiff, a former assistant general counsel, survived dismissal on claims for FMLA interference, FMLA retaliation, and ADA failure to accommodate/discrimination based on alleged retaliation for taking COVID-19 medical leave and requesting accommodation to work remotely from Slovenia.

What This Ruling Means

**Case Summary: Burbach v. Arconic Corporation** This case involved a whistleblower dispute between an employee named Burbach and Arconic Corporation. Burbach apparently reported concerns about workplace issues or potential wrongdoing at the company and then faced negative consequences, leading to a lawsuit claiming illegal retaliation for whistleblowing. The court ruled in favor of Arconic Corporation, meaning Burbach lost the case. The court found that Arconic did not illegally retaliate against Burbach for any whistleblower activities. No damages were awarded to the employee. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights both the protections and challenges that come with whistleblowing. While laws exist to protect employees who report workplace problems, winning these cases can be difficult. Workers need strong evidence to prove that any negative treatment they received was specifically because of their whistleblowing activities, not for other legitimate business reasons. If you're considering reporting workplace issues, document everything carefully and understand that legal protections exist but aren't guaranteed. Consider consulting with an employment attorney before taking action, as these cases require meeting specific legal requirements to succeed. *Note: This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.*

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.