Skip to main content

Thompson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

M.D. Tenn.October 8, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01071
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the trial court's dismissal of the State's Prevailing Wage Act claim against Lion Construction, finding that ERISA does not preempt the state law requirement to pay fringe benefits on public works projects, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

**What This Case Was About** This case involved a dispute over unpaid wages on a public construction project. Lion Construction, LLC was accused of violating Tennessee's Prevailing Wage Act, which requires contractors working on government projects to pay workers specific wage rates and fringe benefits. The construction company argued they didn't have to follow the state wage law because it conflicted with federal ERISA rules (which govern employee benefit plans). A lower court initially dismissed the case, agreeing with the company's argument. **What the Court Decided** The appellate court reversed that decision and sent the case back to the lower court for a full hearing. The court ruled that federal ERISA laws do not override Tennessee's requirement that contractors pay proper wages and benefits on public works projects. This means the state can enforce its prevailing wage law even when federal benefit rules are involved. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects construction workers on government projects by ensuring they can still pursue wage theft claims under state prevailing wage laws. Workers don't lose these important protections just because their employer also has federal benefit obligations. The decision strengthens enforcement of wage standards on taxpayer-funded construction projects.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.