Skip to main content

Ramos v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

M.D. Tenn.August 23, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00152
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of plaintiff's petition for statutory penalties under the Freedom of Information Act, finding that the defendant state's attorney did not act in bad faith when withholding grand jury records.

What This Ruling Means

**Ramos v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a dispute over public records access rather than typical employment issues, despite the case name suggesting otherwise. An individual (Ramos) requested grand jury records from the Winnebago County State's Attorney's Office under the Freedom of Information Act. When the office refused to provide these records, Ramos sued, claiming the office acted in bad faith and seeking financial penalties. The court ruled against Ramos. Both the trial court and appeals court found that the State's Attorney's Office did not act improperly when they withheld the grand jury records. The courts determined the office had legitimate legal reasons for refusing the request and was not acting in bad faith. **Why This Matters for Workers:** While this case primarily deals with public records access, it's relevant for workers because it shows how courts evaluate whether government employers act in "bad faith." The ruling demonstrates that employers (including government agencies) can refuse certain requests if they have valid legal justifications. Workers should understand that proving an employer acted in "bad faith" requires showing intentional wrongdoing, not just disagreement with the employer's decision.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.