Skip to main content

Davis v. Kohler Co.

W.D. Tenn.December 10, 2019No. 1:15-cv-01263
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The University's workplace violence restraining order petition was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, and the appellate court affirmed the dismissal order, rejecting the former employee's attempt to recover attorney's fees and punitive damages.

What This Ruling Means

**Davis v. Kohler Co.: Workplace Violence Restraining Order Case** This case involved a dispute between a former University of California employee and their former employer over a workplace violence restraining order. The University had filed for a restraining order against the former employee, but later voluntarily dismissed their petition with prejudice (meaning they couldn't refile the same claim). The former employee then tried to recover attorney's fees and punitive damages from the University. The court ruled against the former employee. An appellate court upheld the dismissal of the University's original restraining order petition and rejected the former employee's attempt to get attorney's fees and punitive damages. The former employee received no compensation. This case matters for workers because it shows the limits of what you can recover when an employer drops a workplace violence restraining order case. Even if your employer voluntarily dismisses such a petition, you may not automatically be entitled to compensation for your legal costs or damages. Workers facing similar situations should understand that winning the dismissal of a restraining order doesn't guarantee financial recovery, and the legal bar for obtaining attorney's fees in these circumstances can be quite high.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.