James Bucci
Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.
Woodbridge, NJ
Contact Information
- Phone
- (732) 855-6180
- Website
- Visit Website
- Address
- Door #75, 90 Woodbridge Center Dr 8th Floor, Woodbridge, NJ 07095
Professional Details
- Employee Representation
- Research listing. We have not verified whether this attorney currently represents employees. Confirm worker representation before seeking help; a court appearance does not establish current practice.
- Listed Via
- Google Places office listing — View listing — as of Mar 2026
- Office Listing Rating
- 5.0/5 across 1 Google reviewsFirm or office listing data — not an individual attorney rating.
Recent federal employment cases
⚖ public court dockets- Employee v. ATLANTIC DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORIES LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019defense counselpublished opinionFair Labor Standards Actpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022defense counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. Genesis Eldercare Rehabilitation Service, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021defense counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. 200 MARTER AVENUE OPERATIONS, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021defense counselCivil Rights: ADA-Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. GENESIS HEALTHCAREDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021defense counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. SPECIAL PEOPLE IN NORTHEAST, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020defense counselCivil Rights: ADA-Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. GENESIS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020defense counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. PENN COMMUNITY BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020defense counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. Genovese Drug Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019defense counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC
- Employee v. TOWERS WATSON DELAWARE, INC.
- Employee v. Interstate Electrical Services Corporation
- Employee v. PACIFICO FORD, INC.
- Employee v. AT&T, INC.
- Employee v. Rite Aid CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017defense counselFair Labor Standards Actpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. RITE AID OF NEW JERSEY, INC.
- Employee v. CONTINENTAL BANK
- Employee v. RATHER COMPANIES, LC
- Employee v. RITE AID CORPORATION
Source: U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/RECAP via CourtListener). One case is one normalized court+docket number. Attorney-to-docket links are algorithmically matched; ambiguous and lower-confidence identities are excluded.
Each match links this attorney to a public federal case. An appearance does not establish who handled every stage, who prevailed, or the result for any client. These counts are not win rates or ratings. Rows marked “published opinion” open a written decision that passes this site’s public trust checks. Each row also links to its source docket on CourtListener.
This list covers only publicly matched federal cases — it is an undercount, not a career total, and it says nothing about cases in state court, arbitration, or settled before filing.
Employee names are withheld by this site; full captions are available on the public docket.
Useful for evaluating public litigation experience. Court dockets do not reliably measure negotiation or settlement skill; confirm those services with the attorney or firm.
Other Employment Attorneys in Woodbridge
Browse other attorney listings in this area.
Facing a workplace issue?
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Check My RightsAttorney listings are aggregated from public legal directories (including NELA, Avvo, and Google Places). Ratings, review counts, and membership badges are reported by those third-party sources — they are not a verification, endorsement, or recommendation by Workers’ Rights. Inclusion here does not mean the attorney is affiliated with, sponsors, or has any relationship with this site, and no attorney-client relationship is created. Always verify credentials, disciplinary history, and bar standing before retaining an attorney.