Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc.
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2006–2024)
2 trusted published court opinions across 1 distinct case · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc. as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2006 and 2024.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination and Failure To Accommodate.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 1 distinct case.
About this employer
Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc. appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
J.H. v. Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc. (2006) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved employees who sued Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc. for wrongful termination and negligence. During the lawsuit, the trial court judge made an unusual decision—he appointed a guardian ad litem (a court-appointed representative) to act on behalf of the workers, even though they were competent… Read the ruling.
J.H. v. Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc. (2006) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved employees with disabilities who sued Ada S. McKinley Community Services for wrongful termination and failure to provide reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination, Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination and Failure to Accommodate.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA.
Claim Types
Related Laws
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.