Advanced Clinical Employment Staffing LLC
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2022)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Advanced Clinical Employment Staffing LLC as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2022.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in AL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Advanced Clinical Employment Staffing LLC appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Smith v. Advanced Clinical Employment Staffing, LLC (2022) — Defendant Win. Smith filed an employment-related lawsuit against Advanced Clinical Employment Staffing in federal court in June 2022. The specific details of what went wrong between Smith and the staffing company are not clear from the available information, but it involved some type of workplace issue that Smith believed violated em… Read the ruling.
Kneuss v. Advanced Clinical Employment Staffing LLC (2021) — Dismissed. A worker named Kneuss sued Advanced Clinical Employment Staffing, claiming the company failed to pay proper overtime wages and wrongfully fired her. The dispute centered on a $500 extension payment and whether it should have counted toward overtime calculations under federal wage laws. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span Alabama (1), California (1). Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Alabama rulings and California rulings.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.