Alaska Airlines, Inc.
19 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2003–2026)
11 trusted published court opinions across 9 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Alaska Airlines, Inc. as an employer in 19 distinct federal employment cases between 2003 and 2026.
Of the 11 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 were sent back to a lower court, 2 were dismissed, and 2 had a mixed result.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Whistleblower, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in WA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 9 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Alaska Airlines, Inc. appears in 11 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Brown v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. (2026) — Remanded. Employees at Alaska Airlines claimed they were fired because of their religious beliefs. They also alleged the company retaliated against them for complaining about discrimination. Both the airline and the union argued the case should be dismissed before trial. Read the ruling.
Synoracki v. Alaska Airlines Inc (2025) — Remanded. An Alaska Airlines employee filed a lawsuit claiming the airline violated federal law by not properly handling their military leave of absence. The employee's case was initially dismissed by a lower court without a full hearing on the merits. Read the ruling.
Tijerina v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. (2023) — Mixed Result. A worker named Tijerina filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against Alaska Airlines in 2023. The case involved claims that the airline engaged in discriminatory practices against the employee, though the specific details of what type of discrimination occurred are not available from the court records. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (6 of 11), Whistleblower (4 of 11), Wrongful Termination (3 of 11). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Whistleblower and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span Washington (4), California (3), Tennessee (2), Alaska (1). Washington is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Washington rulings, California rulings, Tennessee rulings and Alaska rulings.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
10 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in Alaska Airlines, Inc.’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.