Skip to main content
Transportation
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
19 employment law court rulings from public federal records (2000–2018)
19
Total Rulings
58%
Plaintiff Win Rate
1
States
Case Outcomes
Plaintiff Win
11 (58%)
Mixed Result
4 (21%)
Remanded
3 (16%)
Defendant Win
1 (5%)
Claim Types
Workers’ Compensation
10 (53%)
Wrongful Termination
4 (21%)
Discrimination
3 (16%)
Wage Theft
2 (11%)
Breach of Contract
1 (5%)
Failure to Accommodate
1 (5%)
States
Court Rulings (19)
Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
D.C. CircuitJun 20, 2018
Mixed Result
Battle
DCJan 4, 2018
Plaintiff Win
Jones
DCMay 4, 2017
Remanded
Wmata
D.D.C.Apr 19, 2017District of Columbia
Plaintiff Win
Wmata
DCApr 15, 2010
Mixed Result
Wmata
DCOct 1, 2009
Plaintiff Win
Ferguson
D.D.C.Jun 19, 2009District of Columbia
Mixed Result
Wmata
DCFeb 5, 2009
Defendant Win
Shipkey
DCSep 4, 2008
Remanded
Jackson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
DCSep 4, 2008
Plaintiff Win
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
DCJun 14, 2007
Remanded
McNeal
DCFeb 22, 2007
Plaintiff Win
Adam Barbour v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, United States of America, Intervenor
D.C. CircuitSep 1, 2004
Plaintiff Win
WMATA
D.C. CircuitJul 9, 2004
Plaintiff Win
Wmata
DCJun 26, 2003
Plaintiff Win
Wmata
DCMay 29, 2003
Plaintiff Win
Landesberg
DCMar 28, 2002
Mixed Result
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
DCApr 5, 2001
Plaintiff Win
Walden
DCSep 14, 2000
Plaintiff Win
Other Transportation employers
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Facing a workplace issue with Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority?
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Check My RightsData sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.