Skip to main content
Transportation & Logistics

Amerijet International, Inc.

4 federal employment cases from public court records (20132021)

2 with a published ruling · 2 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Amerijet International, Inc. as an employer in 4 employment matters between 2013 and 2021.

The most common claims on record were Retaliation.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

4
Federal Cases
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Amerijet International, Inc. appears in 2 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The case involves a retaliation claim. Browse other retaliation rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Retaliation.

Claim Types

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Amerijet International, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · Aug 2021
Open docket
Employee v. AMERIJET INTERNATIONAL, INC.
S.D. Fla. · May 2014
Open docket
Amerijet Int'l, Inc. v. Employee
U.S. Supreme Court · Jan 2014 · Retaliation
Defendant Win
Amerijet International, Inc. v. Employee
11th Circuit · May 2013 · Unfair Labor Practices
Mixed Result
Showing 4 of 4

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.