AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
34 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2006–2026)
8 trusted published court opinions across 7 distinct cases · 6 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP as an employer in 34 distinct federal employment cases between 2006 and 2026.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 were dismissed, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 had a mixed result.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Failure To Accommodate, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 6 states, most often in FL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 7 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Tansill v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP (2025) — Dismissed. An employee filed a lawsuit against AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals claiming they were discriminated against, not given reasonable job accommodations, and wrongfully fired. The company asked the court to dismiss the case early, arguing the employee had no valid claims. Read the ruling.
Ivie v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP (2024) — Mixed Result. An employee at AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals filed a lawsuit claiming she faced discrimination and retaliation after reporting safety or legal concerns at the company—actions known as whistleblowing. A jury initially sided with her and awarded $2.4 million in damages. Read the ruling.
Wilhoit v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP (2024) — Defendant Win. Employees at AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals filed a lawsuit claiming the company discriminated against them based on their religion. The workers argued the company failed to accommodate their religious beliefs and treated them unfairly compared to other employees. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (4 of 8), Failure to Accommodate (3 of 8), Retaliation (2 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Retaliation.
Published opinions span Florida (1), Massachusetts (1), North Carolina (1), Oregon (1). Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings, Massachusetts rulings, North Carolina rulings and Oregon rulings.
These published opinions sit within the pharmaceutical sector, where sales-force misclassification, FCA whistleblower-retaliation, and disability-accommodation claims raise unique issues.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Pharmaceutical employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.