Aviva Rand
1 federal employment case from public court records (2025–2025)
1 with a published ruling
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Aviva Rand as an employer in 1 employment matter since 2025.
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 1 state (IL).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
About this employer
Aviva Rand appears in one federal employment-law court ruling on record. The case sits within the broader workplace context. Employment-law cases tracked on Workers' Rights come from CourtListener's federal-court opinion corpus and reflect rulings that produced a written decision — many disputes settle or are dismissed before reaching this stage.
The case involves a breach of contract claim. Browse other breach of contract rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Breach of Contract.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
The case was filed in Illinois. Illinois is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Illinois rulings.
Claim Types
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with court rulings
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.