Beverly Health
8 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1997–2016)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Beverly Health as an employer in 8 distinct federal employment cases between 1997 and 2016.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 1 state (WV).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Beverly Health appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2003) — Mixed Result. This case involved Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, a healthcare company, and several disputes over how it treated employees during labor organizing activities. Read the ruling.
Beverly Hlth Rehab v. NLRB (2003) — Mixed Result. This case involved a dispute between Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services and the National Labor Relations Board over how the company treated workers during a labor dispute. Read the ruling.
Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner (2002) — Defendant Win. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, a healthcare company, was accused of retaliating against workers and wrongfully firing employees who were involved in union activities. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation, Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation and Wrongful Termination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span West Virginia. West Virginia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. West Virginia rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.