Stiefel Laboratories, Inc.
13 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2007–2016)
16 trusted published court opinions across 13 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. as an employer in 13 distinct federal employment cases between 2007 and 2016.
Of the 16 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 6 ended in a ruling for the worker, 6 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 were dismissed, and 2 had a mixed result.
Plaintiffs won 6 of 16 adjudicated opinions (38%).
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Wrongful Termination, and Whistleblower.
Cases were filed across 1 state (FL).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 13 distinct cases.
6 of 16 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Positive amounts in plaintiff-win, mixed-outcome, or settlement opinions only. AI-extracted; amounts may not equal money paid.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. appears in 16 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Richard I. Fried v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. (2016) — Defendant Win. Richard Fried, a former employee of Stiefel Laboratories (a pharmaceutical company), sued his former employer claiming they committed fraud and that he faced retaliation for whistleblowing. Fried alleged that the company engaged in wrongdoing and that he suffered consequences for reporting or exposing these issues. Read the ruling.
Muñiz-Olivari v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. (2008) — Plaintiff Win. Read the ruling.
Muñiz-Olivari v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. (2008) — Plaintiff Win. An employee sued Stiefel Laboratories after the company allegedly broke his employment contract and wrongfully fired him. The worker claimed the company violated the terms of his job agreement when they terminated him improperly. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (9 of 16), Wrongful Termination (3 of 16), Whistleblower. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Wrongful Termination and Whistleblower.
Published opinions span Florida. Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
16 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.