Richard I. Fried v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Dubina, Pryor, Robreno, William
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- Circuit
- Eleventh Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment as a matter of law in favor of Stiefel Labs and Stiefel on Fried's securities fraud claim, holding that the proposed jury instruction incorrectly stated the law regarding disclosure duties under Rule 10b-5(b).
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Richard I. Fried v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.