Burr Road Operating Company II, LLC
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2016)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Burr Road Operating Company II, LLC as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2016.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 1 state (CT).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Burr Road Operating Company II, LLC appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Burr Road Operating Co. II, LLC v. New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199 (2016) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute between Burr Road Operating Co. II, LLC (a healthcare company) and New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199. The specific details of what triggered the disagreement aren't provided in the available information, but it was an employment law matter between the company and the un… Read the ruling.
Burr Road Operating Co. II, LLC v. New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199 (2015) — Plaintiff Win. Note: This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Read the ruling.
Burr Road Operating Co. v. New England Health Care Employees Union (2013) — Defendant Win. Burr Road Operating Company, which appears to be a healthcare facility operator, got into a legal dispute with the New England Health Care Employees Union. While the specific details aren't provided in the available information, this was an employment law case that likely involved disagreements over worker rights, unio… Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a wrongful termination claim. Browse other wrongful termination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span Connecticut. Connecticut is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Connecticut rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.