Skip to main content
Government & Public Sector

California Public Employees' Retirement System

31 federal employment cases from public court records (20002026)

31 with a published ruling

What public court records show

Public federal court records list California Public Employees' Retirement System as an employer in 31 employment matters between 2000 and 2026.

Of the 30 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 21 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 were sent back to a lower court, 3 were dismissed, and 2 had a mixed result.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 3% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Discrimination, and Wrongful Termination.

Cases were filed across 1 state (CA).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

31
Federal Cases
3%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

1
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

California Public Employees' Retirement System appears in 30 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The cases primarily involve Breach of Contract (14 of 30), Discrimination (4 of 30), Wrongful Termination (3 of 30). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Discrimination and Wrongful Termination.

Rulings span California. California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
21 (70%)
Remanded
3 (10%)
Dismissed
3 (10%)
Mixed Result
2 (7%)
Plaintiff Win
1 (3%)

Case Stages

The stage at which courts issued California Public Employees' Retirement System’s 29 stage-identified rulings.

Appeal
27 (93%)
Motion to dismiss
2 (7%)
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Motion to dismiss
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

States

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. California Public Employees' Retirement System
OLC · Apr 2026 · Breach of Contract
Dismissed
Employee v. Cal. Public Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Ct. App. · Mar 2026
Defendant Win
Employee v. Cal. Public Employees' Retirement System CA2/2
Cal. Ct. App. · Feb 2026 · Wrongful Termination
Defendant Win
Employee v. California Public Employees' Retirement System CA2/3
Cal. Ct. App. · Jul 2023 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. CA Public Employee Retirement System
E.D. Cal. · Sep 2021 · California · Discrimination
Dismissed
Employee v. Cal. Public Employees' Retirement System CA2/3
Cal. Ct. App. · Apr 2021 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Cal. Public Employees' Retirement System CA2/7
Cal. Ct. App. · Apr 2021 · Breach of Contract
Mixed Result
Employee v. CA Public Employee Retirement System
E.D. Cal. · Dec 2020 · California
Defendant Win
Employee v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys.
U.S. Supreme Court · Apr 2019
Dismissed
Employee v. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys.
CALCTAPP5D · Apr 2019 · Wrongful Termination
Defendant Win
Employee v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys.
Cal. Supreme · Mar 2019 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Supreme · Mar 2019
Defendant Win
Employee v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Auth.
CALCTAPP5D · May 2018
Defendant Win
Employee v. California Public Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Ct. App. · Dec 2016 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Public Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Ct. App. · Jun 2016 · California · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Public Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Ct. App. · Sep 2015 · California · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Public Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Ct. App. · Aug 2015 · California · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Public Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Ct. App. · May 2015 · California · Breach of Contract
Mixed Result
Employee v. Board of Administration of California Public Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Ct. App. · Feb 2014 · California · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement System
Cal. Ct. App. · Nov 2012 · California · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Superior Court
Cal. Ct. App. · Feb 2008 · Whistleblower
Defendant Win
Employee v. Board of Administration of the California Employees' Retirement System
9th Circuit · May 2007
Defendant Win
Employee v. California Public Employees' Retirement System
9th Circuit · Nov 2006 · Discrimination
Defendant Win
CP Holdings, Inc. v. Employee
8th Circuit · Nov 2006
Defendant Win
Employee v. California Public Employees' Retirement System
9th Circuit · Feb 2005
Defendant Win
Showing 25 of 31

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.