Skip to main content
Manufacturing

FCA US LLC

102 federal employment cases from public court records (19842025)

25 with a published ruling · 77 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list FCA US LLC as an employer in 102 employment matters between 1984 and 2025.

Of the 23 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 12 ended in a ruling for the employer, 4 ended in a ruling for the worker, 4 had a mixed result, and 2 were dismissed.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 17% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Breach Of Contract, and Wrongful Termination.

Cases were filed across 9 states, most often in MI.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

102
Federal Cases
17%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

9
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

FCA US LLC appears in 23 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The cases primarily involve Discrimination (10 of 23), Breach of Contract (8 of 23), Wrongful Termination (5 of 23). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Breach of Contract and Wrongful Termination.

Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA.

Rulings span Michigan (10), California (2), Ohio (2), Georgia (1). Michigan is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Michigan rulings, California rulings, Ohio rulings and Georgia rulings.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
12 (52%)
Plaintiff Win
4 (17%)
Mixed Result
4 (17%)
Dismissed
2 (9%)
Remanded
1 (4%)

Case Stages

The stage at which courts issued FCA US LLC’s 23 stage-identified rulings.

Appeal
7 (30%)
Summary judgment
8 (35%)

Of the 8 summary-judgment rulings, 6 ended the case in FCA US LLC’s favor and 2 let the worker’s claims continue.

Motion to dismiss
7 (30%)
Other rulings
1 (4%)
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Summary judgment
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Motion to dismiss
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Other rulings
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Executive Office of the President
D.D.C. · Dec 2025 · Michigan · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. FCA US LLC
E.D. Mich. · Oct 2025
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US LLC
E.D. Cal. · Sep 2025 · California
Dismissed
Employee v. FCA, U.S., LLC
E.D. Mich. · Jun 2025
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US, LLC
E.D. Mich. · Jun 2025
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US LLC
E.D. Wis. · May 2025
Open docket
Employee v. Allan Grubb/Adam Panter
W.D. Okla. · Mar 2025 · Oklahoma · Sexual Harassment
Defendant Win
FCA US LLC v. Employee
C.D. Cal. · Jan 2025 · California
Defendant Win
FCA US LLC v. Employee
D. Minn. · Jan 2025 · Minnesota · Breach of Contract
Open docket
FCA US LLC v. Employee
S.D. Ind. · Jan 2025 · Indiana · Retaliation
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US, LLC
E.D. Mich. · Jan 2025
Open docket
Employee v. Garnett, Kansas, City of
D. Kan. · Oct 2024 · Kansas · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. City of Porterville
E.D. Cal. · Sep 2024 · Indiana · Discrimination
Defendant Win
Employee v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
D. Conn. · Jul 2024 · Connecticut · Breach of Contract
Mixed Result
Employee v. Brunswick Housing Authority
S.D. Ga. · May 2024 · Georgia · Wrongful Termination
Plaintiff Win
Employee v. FCA US, LLC
E.D. Mich. · May 2024
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US, LLC
E.D. Mich. · Apr 2024
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US LLC
W.D. Va. · Oct 2023
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US LLC/Stellantis
E.D. Mich. · Jul 2023
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US LLC
N.D. Ohio · Jun 2023
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US LLC
E.D. Mich. · Jun 2023
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US LLC
D. Colo. · Jan 2023
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US, LLC
N.D. Ohio · Aug 2022
Open docket
Employee v. FCA US LLC Stellantis
N.D. Ohio · Aug 2022
Open docket
Employee v. MILLS
D. Me. · Jan 2022 · Maine · Wrongful Termination
Plaintiff Win
Showing 25 of 102

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.