Florida Power Corp.
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2001–2009)
4 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Florida Power Corp. as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2001 and 2009.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Whistleblower, and Retaliation.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
About this employer
Florida Power Corp. appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Carlos M. Muino v. U.S. Department of Labor (2009) — Defendant Win. Carlos Muino worked for Florida Power & Light Company and claimed the company fired him in retaliation for whistleblowing activities protected under the Energy Reorganization Act. Muino alleged that he reported safety or compliance concerns and was then punished for doing so. Read the ruling.
Wanda L. Adams v. Florida Power Corporation (2001) — Defendant Win. Wanda Adams sued Florida Power Corporation claiming age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The key issue wasn't whether Adams faced direct discrimination, but whether she could use a legal theory called "disparate impact" to prove her case. Read the ruling.
Wanda L. Adams v. Florida Power Corporation (2001) — Defendant Win. Wanda Adams sued Florida Power Corporation, claiming the company's employment practices had a discriminatory impact on older workers. Adams argued that even if the company didn't intentionally discriminate based on age, their policies still hurt older employees as a group more than younger ones. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Whistleblower, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Whistleblower and Retaliation.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.