Gannett Co., Inc.
37 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1995–2025)
11 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Gannett Co., Inc. is named as a defendant in 37 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1995 and 2025.
Of the 11 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 6 ended in a ruling for the worker, 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 was dismissed, and 1 had a mixed result.
Plaintiffs won 6 of 11 adjudicated opinions (55%).
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Failure To Accommodate, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in NY.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
6 of 11 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Gannett Co., Inc. appears in 11 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Figueroa v. Gannett Company Incorporated (2023) — Plaintiff Win. Natalie Figueroa sued Gannett Company Incorporated, claiming she faced discrimination at work because of a disability covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The company did not provide her with necessary accommodations or treated her unfairly because of her disability status. Read the ruling.
Figueroa v. Gannett Company Incorporated (2023) — Plaintiff Win. Figueroa filed a lawsuit against Gannett Company (a major media corporation) claiming she faced discrimination based on a disability. She alleged the company failed to make reasonable changes to help her work effectively and created a hostile workplace environment because of her disability condition. Read the ruling.
Figueroa v. Gannett Company Incorporated (2022) — Plaintiff Win. A worker filed a lawsuit against Gannett Company, claiming she was discriminated against because of a disability. She also alleged that the company failed to make reasonable adjustments to help her work and wrongfully fired her. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (6 of 11), Failure to Accommodate (4 of 11), Wrongful Termination (4 of 11). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span New York (6), Arizona (4), Mississippi (1). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings, Arizona rulings and Mississippi rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
11 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in Gannett Co., Inc.’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
7 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
- Matter of DiFalco (Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · New York
- Matter of Nicholas (Commissioner of Labor)N.Y. App. Div. · 2018 · New York
- Matter of Smith (Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)N.Y. App. Div. · 2018 · New York
- Matter of Soule (Commr. of Labor)N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · New York
- Matter of Gager (Commr. of Labor)N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · New York
- Matter of Travis (Commr. of Labor)N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · New York
- Matter of Hunter (Commr. of Labor)N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · New York
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.