Figueroa v. Gannett Company Incorporated
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- jury verdict
- State
- Arizona
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff Figueroa prevailed in her ADA disability discrimination case against Gannett Company. The jury awarded $275,000 in compensatory damages and $3,700,000 in punitive damages (reduced to statutory cap of $300,000 combined), plus $93,457.04 in back pay with pre-judgment interest. The court denied defendant's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for new trial.
What This Ruling Means
Figueroa v. Gannett Company: Court Rules in Favor of Employee
What Happened
Figueroa filed a lawsuit against Gannett Company (a major media corporation) claiming she faced discrimination based on a disability. She alleged the company failed to make reasonable changes to help her work effectively and created a hostile workplace environment because of her disability condition.
The Court's Decision
A jury sided with Figueroa and awarded her $393,457.04 in total compensation. This included nearly $94,000 in back pay (wages she lost), plus additional damages for the harm she experienced. The judge upheld the jury's decision, rejecting Gannett's requests for a new trial.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employees with disabilities have legal protection against unfair treatment at work. Employers must make reasonable accommodations (modifications that help disabled workers perform their jobs) and cannot create unwelcoming workplace environments. The significant award sends a message that companies face real financial consequences for violating these protections. Workers facing similar discrimination now have precedent showing courts will hold employers accountable.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Figueroa from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.