Figueroa v. Gannett Company Incorporated
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- jury verdict
- State
- Arizona
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff Figueroa prevailed on ADA disability discrimination and failure to accommodate claims. The jury found defendants liable for wrongful termination based on disability and failure to provide reasonable accommodation. The court awarded back pay of $87,455 plus prejudgment interest of approximately $2,500+, recognizing that Figueroa's physical and emotional deterioration following termination prevented her from mitigating damages.
What This Ruling Means
Figueroa v. Gannett Company Incorporated - Plain English Summary
What Happened
Figueroa worked for Gannett Company Incorporated and had a disability. She claimed the company fired her because of her disability and refused to make reasonable changes to help her do her job.
What the Court Decided
The jury agreed with Figueroa. The court found that Gannett unlawfully discriminated against her based on her disability, failed to provide necessary workplace accommodations, and wrongfully fired her. The company was ordered to pay Figueroa $90,489 in damages, including $87,455 in back pay (the wages she lost) plus interest.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot legally fire workers because of disabilities. Companies must make reasonable adjustments to help disabled employees succeed at work. If they don't, they can face significant financial penalties. The ruling also shows courts recognize that losing a job affects people's health and ability to find new work, which can influence how much compensation they owe. Workers with disabilities have legal protections against unfair treatment.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Figueroa from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.