Google LLC
41 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2004–2026)
7 trusted published court opinions across 7 distinct cases · 19 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Google LLC as an employer in 41 distinct federal employment cases between 2004 and 2026.
Of the 7 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 had a mixed result, 2 were dismissed, 1 ended in a ruling for the employer, and 1 settled.
The most common claims on record were Failure To Accommodate, Wage Theft, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 7 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Google LLC appears in 7 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
C.C. v. Google, Inc. (2025) — Mixed Result. An employee filed a lawsuit against Google claiming the company discriminated against them based on disability, failed to provide necessary workplace accommodations, and retaliated against them for raising concerns about these issues. Read the ruling.
Hall v. Google LLC (2025) — Dismissed. An employee filed a lawsuit against Google claiming the company failed to provide necessary workplace accommodations. The employee filed updated versions of their complaint multiple times as the case progressed. Read the ruling.
Bowlay-Williams v. Google, LLC (2023) — Settlement. A Google employee named Bowlay-Williams filed a lawsuit against the tech giant in August 2023, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The lawsuit was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other worker protections. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Failure to Accommodate (2 of 7), Wage Theft, Disability Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Failure to Accommodate, Wage Theft and Disability Discrimination.
Published opinions span California (2), New York (2), Virginia (1), Georgia (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, New York rulings, Virginia rulings and Georgia rulings.
These published opinions sit within the technology sector, where age-discrimination, non-compete, and whistleblower-retaliation claims appear frequently.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
7 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Technology employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.