Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
13 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2009–2025)
5 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. as an employer in 13 distinct federal employment cases between 2009 and 2025.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer and 1 were dismissed.
The most common claims on record were Failure To Accommodate, Discrimination, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 1 state (HI).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
O'Hailpin v. Hawaiian Airlines Inc. (2025) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employment dispute between a worker named O'Hailpin and Hawaiian Airlines. While the specific details of what happened between the employee and the airline are not provided in the available information, the case dealt with employment law issues that were serious enough to go to court. Read the ruling.
O'Hailpin v. Hawaiian Airlines Inc. (2025) — Defendant Win. This case involved a civil rights and employment discrimination claim by a worker named O'Hailpin against Hawaiian Airlines Inc. The employee alleged that the airline violated their civil rights in some aspect of their employment, though the specific details of what happened are not available from the court records pro… Read the ruling.
Nelson v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (2024) — Dismissed. A group of 162 employees sued Hawaiian Airlines, claiming the company discriminated against them based on their religious beliefs and failed to make reasonable accommodations for their religious practices. They also alleged the company retaliated against them for raising these concerns. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Failure to Accommodate (3 of 5), Discrimination (3 of 5), Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Failure to Accommodate, Discrimination and Breach of Contract.
Published opinions span Hawaii. Hawaii is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Hawaii rulings.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
5 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.