HCL America, Inc.
14 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2016–2025)
6 trusted published court opinions across 1 distinct case · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list HCL America, Inc. as an employer in 14 distinct federal employment cases between 2016 and 2025.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 had a mixed result, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 ended in a ruling for the employer.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 1 state (CA).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 1 distinct case.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
HCL America, Inc. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Handloser v. HCL America, Inc. (2021) — Mixed Result. Employees at HCL America, Inc. filed a lawsuit claiming they faced discrimination and unfair treatment based on protected characteristics. The company asked the court to dismiss or limit the case, while the employees argued their discrimination claims should proceed. Read the ruling.
Handloser v. HCL America, Inc. (2021) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employment dispute between an employee named Handloser and their employer, HCL America, Inc., a technology services company. The specific details of what triggered the lawsuit are not provided in the available information, but it involved employment law claims filed in federal court in March 2021. Read the ruling.
Handloser v. HCL America, Inc. (2020) — Mixed Result. Employees at HCL America, Inc. filed a discrimination lawsuit. During the case, they tried to get documents from a third party called VDart by issuing a subpoena—a legal request for evidence. HCL America tried to block this, preventing the employees from obtaining the documents they needed. Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a discrimination claim. Browse other discrimination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Discrimination.
Published opinions span California. California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings.
These published opinions sit within the technology sector, where age-discrimination, non-compete, and whistleblower-retaliation claims appear frequently.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Technology employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.