Skip to main content
Transportation & Logistics

Hertz Corporation

10 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2009–2025)

2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date

What public court records show

In public federal court records, Hertz Corporation is named as a party in 10 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2009 and 2025.

The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, and Workers Compensation.

Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

2
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.

1
State

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Hertz Corporation appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. The most recent written decision on record:

Sealy v. the HERTZ CORPORATION (2009) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employee named Sealy who filed a discrimination lawsuit against Hertz Corporation, the car rental company. Sealy claimed that Hertz had discriminated against them in violation of employment laws, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available informatio… Read the ruling.

The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, Workers’ Compensation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wrongful Termination and Workers’ Compensation.

Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.

These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
D. Conn. · Aug 2025
Employee v. Hertz Local Edition Corp.
C.D. Cal. · Dec 2023
Docket closed
Employee v. Wa State Department Of Labor & Industries
Wash. Ct. App. · Jun 2023 · Workers’ Compensation
Outcome shown from the court record; the employer was not a party to this appeal against an agency — see the opinion
See opinion
Employee v. Hertz Local Edition Corp.
C.D. Cal. · Sep 2021
Docket closed
Employee v. Hertz Car Sales, LLC.
S.D. Ohio · Apr 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. HERTZ LOCAL EDITION CORP.
E.D. Pa. · Jun 2018
Docket closed
Employee v. Hertz Local Edition Corp.
E.D. Cal. · Dec 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corp.
M.D. Tenn. · Oct 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. Hertz Local Edition Corp.
N.D. Cal. · May 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. the HERTZ CORPORATION
S.D.N.Y. · Aug 2009 · New York · Discrimination
Defendant Win
Showing 10 of 10

Other court records naming this party

1 published opinion names this party but is not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.